How to be a Project Student in the Intelligent Music Lab
Charles Martin - The Australian National University
Ngunnawal & Ngambri & Ngarigu Country
Welcome! Great to have you here!
You’re now part of a research lab (woo hoo!)
It’s a loose network of academics, HDR students, and Master/Undergrad project students!
- Sometimes we have a formal project (e.g., Charles is my supervisor).
- Sometimes we have a collaboration (e.g., I’m working on a paper with Yichen and Charles).
- Sometimes it’s part of a job (e.g., I’m a research assistant working for Henry).
- Sometimes we just participate (e.g., I’m going to go to Ben’s seminar today to hear about live coding).
What is this lecture about?
A brief intro to how work on a project with Charles and others in the lab.
Expectations: what we expect of you, what you can expect from us.
How to plan research
Guide to weekly activities
Guide to the “shape” of a project.
Problems (for Charles):
there are (up to) 10 of you and only one of me!
every student needs some of the same information
progress on projects is uneven over the semester
sometimes students don’t show up
Problems (for you):
- you have to define a project, execute it, and write it up! (it’s a lot of work - luckily you have 1-2 semesters to do it!)
- you might be new to research (for now!)
- you might not have a lot of background knowledge (yet!)
- research projects are tricky! sometimes ideas don’t work out, you have to be flexible but committed to reaching the goal (handing in a report/artefact/thesis)
- you’re probably busy! (other subjects, jobs, life!)
The Weekly Status Meeting
How it works:
This is a group meeting, online, once per week. In each meeting you will be asked three questions:
- What progress have you made?
- What obstacles have you encountered?
- What is your next step?
- to gain an understanding of how everybody in the lab is going with their project
- to determine if anybody requires individual meetings
Status meeting will be only 30 minutes! (approx 3 minutes each!)
Does this look like agile development? Ref: (Hicks and Foster, 2010)
On-demand Individual Meeting (<= 30 minutes)
How it works:
This is an individual meeting, either online or in-person. Book a time through Microsoft Bookings.
Will have a specific goal e.g.:
- talk about possible solutions to problem X
- fix technical issue Y
- discuss an ethics protocol
- analyse results to an experiment
- goal should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Time-bound)
Student and supervisor should know exactly what we are going to discuss.
How it works:
A group meeting for delivering information with relevance to multiple people. This will be dual-delivery! (both in-person and online).
- how to structure a report/thesis in LaTeX
- how to structure a git repository for project delivery
- how to apply for an ethics protocol
- how to run a user study
- research topics in musical machine learning (mostly from Creative Prediction
- research topics in sound and music computing (some overlap with COMP2710 Laptop Ensemble)
- research topics in interactive media (some overlap with COMP1720 Art and Interaction Computing)
Revision: Three types of meeting
- Status meeting: just for updating status (not research)
- On-demand meeting: just for discussing research (not status)
- Seminar: just for 1-to-N information delivery (like this)
The shape of a project
Let’s go through these in detail…
- Defining research topic and objectives
- Background reading
- Finding your “unsolved problem”
- Discovering code frameworks and starting points.
- If studying humans: applying for ethics approval.
- Coding up a system
- Iterating on a design
- Running experiments
- Expressing your process
- Analysing and discussing results
- Making images and plots
- Coming up with your findings and contributions
- Writing documentation and packaging code
Your grade is based on a combination of your written report, artefact, and presentations.
Examiners look for your ability to:
understand and synthesise existing research
create an artefact, or code project skillfully, and explain it
perform experiments or critically engage with your research problem.
Your grade is not based on your results (really!) (see Honours marking guidelines)
If you get “good” results (yay!) but don’t discuss them in detail, or critically engage in why they are good, you won’t do well. (and the converse)
A bad project plan
Getting started: Weeks 1-9
The Work: Weeks 10-11
The Write-up: Week 12
A better project plan
Getting started: Weeks 1-6
The Work: Weeks 3-10
The Write-up: Week 6 and Weeks 9-12
To help, here’s some deadlines:
- End of week 6: Draft of report Introduction and Background sections (and draft code repository)
- End of week 8: Draft of report System Design section (and draft code repository)
- Start of week 11: Draft full report
- S1: End of week 6: Draft of report Introduction
- S1: End of week 8: Draft of report Background section
- S1: End of week 11: Draft code repository and/or report System Design sections
- S2: End of week 6: Draft of Experimental Methodology and Results sections
- S2: End of week 8: Full report, draft 1
- S2: End of week 11: Full report, draft 2
If you are studying humans (surveys, questionnaires, user studies) you need ethics approval.
All Australian National University researchers (staff or students) who intend on conducting research involving the collection of data from human participants need to apply for ANU Human Ethics approval before starting their data collection.
- Gaining ethics approval is an important part of research work.
- Many CS student projects do not need user studies to be successful.
- Consider what “evaluation” looks like early in your project (esp. 1-semester projects)
- Ethics approval should be done in first semester of 2-semester projects or before week 6 in 1-semester projects.
communication and critical analysis of your project is most important aspect in grading
expect the “work” to take a long time, need to prioritise getting this started early in project
start write up as soon as your start your project
meetings are precious — most issues can be handled in team meetings. individual meetings only for critical issues / inflection points in project.
studies with humans require ethics approval—no exceptions.